Skilled Nursing Facilities face mounting pressure with the new CMS staffing mandates. The gap between strict Hours Per Resident Day (HPRD) regulations and the available workforce is widening at an alarming rate.
But when a facility falls short of these minimums and a resident experiences an adverse event, the liability questions become incredibly complex. Was it an unavoidable crisis, or a systemic failure of care?
The Case Study (Objective Expert Review): Recently, ECS was retained to review a case involving a SNF that consistently missed their RN and CNA thresholds. Following a resident's severe decline, litigation ensued. The plaintiff argued systemic understaffing caused a failure to monitor. The defense maintained that sudden agency staff cancellations created an unforeseeable crisis, and the standard of care was still met by existing staff.
As expert witnesses, our role isn't to adopt either side's narrative—it is to uncover what the staffing and clinical records actually support. We forensically reconstructed the payroll-based journal (PBJ) data and nursing flow sheets to determine exactly where the standard of care was—or wasn't—met.
The Breakdown (What We Look For): When analyzing staffing-related adverse events, the truth usually lies in the granular details of the operational data. We objectively evaluate three critical areas:
The Takeaway: As staffing mandates tighten, the margin for error shrinks. Defensible staffing models and flawless documentation are the only ways to ensure quality outcomes and clarify the facts when litigation arises.
How ECS Can Help: Whether you are an attorney seeking an unbiased, administrative expert to review a complex file, or a SNF operator looking to proactively audit your staffing protocols, we can help. Visit us at www.expertconsultingservices.com to connect with our team of elder care experts.